Relation between CommonJS, AMD and RequireJS?

Relation between CommonJS, AMD and RequireJS?

I’m still very confused about CommonJS, AMD and RequireJS. Even after reading a lot.
I know that CommonJS (formerly ServerJS) is a group for defining some JavaScript specifications (i.e. modules) when the language is used outside the browser. CommonJS modules specification has some implementation like Node.js or RingoJS, right?
What’s the relation between CommonJS, Asynchronous Module Definition (AMD) and RequireJS? Is RequireJS an implementation of CommonJS module definition? If yes, what’s AMD then?

Solutions/Answers:

Solution 1:

RequireJS implements the AMD API (source).

CommonJS is a way of defining modules with the help of an exports object, that defines the module contents. Simply put, a CommonJS implementation might work like this:

// someModule.js
exports.doSomething = function() { return "foo"; };

//otherModule.js
var someModule = require('someModule'); // in the vein of node    
exports.doSomethingElse = function() { return someModule.doSomething() + "bar"; };

Basically, CommonJS specifies that you need to have a require() function to fetch dependencies, an exports variable to export module contents and a module identifier (which describes the location of the module in question in relation to this module) that is used to require the dependencies (source). CommonJS has various implementations, including Node.js, which you mentioned.

CommonJS was not particularly designed with browsers in mind, so it doesn’t fit in the browser environment very well (I really have no source for this–it just says so everywhere, including the RequireJS site.

Solution 2:

CommonJS is more than that – it’s a project to define a common API and ecosystem for JavaScript. One part of CommonJS is the Module specification. Node.js and RingoJS are server-side JavaScript runtimes, and yes, both of them implement modules based on the CommonJS Module spec.

AMD (Asynchronous Module Definition) is another specification for modules. RequireJS is probably the most popular implementation of AMD. One major difference from CommonJS is that AMD specifies that modules are loaded asynchronously – that means modules are loaded in parallel, as opposed to blocking the execution by waiting for a load to finish.

AMD is generally more used in client-side (in-browser) JavaScript development due to this, and CommonJS Modules are generally used server-side. However, you can use either module spec in either environment – for example, RequireJS offers directions for running in Node.js and browserify is a CommonJS Module implementation that can run in the browser.

Solution 3:

The short answer would be:

CommonJS and AMD are specifications (or formats) on how modules and their dependencies should be declared in javascript applications.

RequireJS is a script loader library that is AMD compliant, curljs being another example.

CommonJS compliant:

Taken from Addy Osmani’s book.

// package/lib is a dependency we require
var lib = require( "package/lib" );

// behavior for our module
function foo(){
    lib.log( "hello world!" );
}

// export (expose) foo to other modules as foobar
exports.foobar = foo;

AMD compliant:

// package/lib is a dependency we require
define(["package/lib"], function (lib) {

    // behavior for our module
    function foo() {
        lib.log( "hello world!" );
    }

    // export (expose) foo to other modules as foobar
    return {
        foobar: foo
    }
});

Somewhere else the module can be used with:

require(["package/myModule"], function(myModule) {
    myModule.foobar();
});

Some background:

Actually, CommonJS is much more than an API declaration and only a part of it deals with that. AMD started as a draft specification for the module format on the CommonJS list, but full consensus wasn’t reached and further development of the format moved to the amdjs group. Arguments around which format is better state that CommonJS attempts to cover a broader set of concerns and that it’s better suited for server side development given its synchronous nature, and that AMD is better suited for client side (browser) development given its asynchronous nature and the fact that it has its roots in Dojo’s module declaration implementation.

Sources:

Solution 4:

Quoting

AMD:

  • One browser-first approach
  • Opting for asynchronous behavior and simplified backwards compatibility
  • It doesn’t have any concept of File I/O.
  • It supports objects, functions, constructors, strings, JSON and many other types of modules.

CommonJS:

  • One server-first approach
  • Assuming synchronous behavior
  • Cover a broader set of concerns such as I/O, File system, Promises and more.
  • Supports unwrapped modules, it can feel a little more close to the ES.next/Harmony specifications, freeing you of the define() wrapper that AMD enforces.
  • Only support objects as modules.

Solution 5:

It is quite normal to organize JavaScript program modular into several files and to call child-modules from the main js module.

The thing is JavaScript doesn’t provide this. Not even today in latest browser versions of Chrome and FF.

But, is there any keyword in JavaScript to call another JavaScript module?

This question may be a total collapse of the world for many because the answer is No.


In ES5 ( released at 2009 ) JavaScript had no keywords like import, include, or require.

ES6 saves the day ( released at 2015 ) proposing the import keyword ( https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/import ), but no browser implements this.

If you use Babel 6.18.0 and transpile with ES2015 option only

import myDefault from "my-module";

you will get require again.

"use strict";
var _myModule = require("my-module");
var _myModule2 = _interopRequireDefault(_myModule);
function _interopRequireDefault(obj) { return obj && obj.__esModule ? obj : { default: obj }; }

This is because require means the module will be loaded from Node.js. Node.js will handle everything from system level file read to wrapping functions into the module.

Because in JavaScript functions are the only wrappers to represent the modules.

I’m a lot confused about CommonJS and AMD?

Both CommonJS and AMD are just two different techniques how to overcome the JavaScript “defect” to load modules smart.